- The National International Private Law Development: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the Application of International Private Law
- What Has The Year of the Rat Prepared for Accountants?
- Review of Russian Legislative Changes in 2020
- New Year – New Rules
- FAQ on Cyprus
- Ongoing Search for a Beneficial Owner of Income: Overview of Recent Court Decisions for 2019
- Special Instance, Professional Representation, Continuous Cassation and Other Changes in the Process
- There is no profit but there are taxes
- AML 5, or Nice to Meet You
FAQ on Cyprus
Non-domiciled tax resident of Cyprus: why and how?
Why would one want to become a tax resident of Cyprus?
Before spending time on studying the theory, practice, and even more so, on monitoring changes in the Cyprus tax legislation, the first things you need to do is to decide whether you need it at all.
The question why it is particularly important to become a non-domiciled tax resident is answered in the table below. It shows tax effects for Russian tax residents and Cyprus tax residents, both domiciled and non-domiciled.
The table shows tax effects of receiving income in the form of dividends / loan interest in the amount of, for example, EUR 100 from a Hong Kong company.
Thus, tax savings of non-domiciled tax residents of Cyprus is obvious. However, it should be pointed out that the table shows tax effects only for passive income, namely dividends and passive interest income (i.e. preferential tax treatment does not apply to all types of income).
Therefore, when making a decision on one’s tax residency, one should take into account tax effects for all types of income, including tax effects at the source of income payment, since some jurisdictions have provided for an increased personal income tax rate for certain types of income paid by Russian tax residents in favor of foreign tax residents. For example, when receiving a salary from a Russian company, an employer as a tax agent will have to withhold personal income tax at an increased rate of 30% of the salary paid to a foreign (in our case, Cyprus) tax resident.
How could one become a non-domiciled tax resident of Cyprus?
Amendments to the tax legislation providing for the introduction of a new test for determining the tax residence of individuals (“60-day rule”) were adopted in mid-2017. The amendments have become effective retrospectively since January 1, 2017 and have been applied since the 2017 tax period (in Cyprus a tax period coincides with a calendar year).
Once the “60-day rule” becomes effective, an individual shall be considered a tax resident of Cyprus if he/she complies with one the following criteria: the existing “183 days” criterion or the new “60-day rule” during the tax period.
The “60-day rule” applies to individuals for whom all of the following conditions were met simultaneously during the current tax period:
- They have not been in any other country for a period exceeding 183 days in total;
- They are not tax residents of any other country;
- They have been in Cyprus for at least 60 days;
- They have other connections with Cyprus (they own / rent a place of residence during a long period of time and have business or are employed in Cyprus).
An individual tax resident of Cyprus shall be exempt from taxation in Cyprus in respect of worldwide income (whether derived from sources in Cyprus or from other jurisdictions) in the form of dividends and “passive” interest income, if for tax purposes such an individual is not considered to be permanently resident in Cyprus.
An individual who has no “domicile by birth” in Cyprus (Domicile of Origin) shall be recognized for tax purposes as a permanent resident of Cyprus, in case the individual was considered a tax resident of Cyprus for any 17 years out of the 20 years preceding the current tax period. The concept of “Domicile of Origin” shall be assigned at the time of birth and it usually corresponds with the domicile of the father at the time of the child birth, and in exceptional cases – with the domicile of the mother.
It should be noted that applying the “60-day rule” is more of an opportunity allowing to apply a preferential tax treatment, while living in Cyprus for 60 days or more does not automatically make an individual a non-domiciled tax resident of Cyprus.
Legislation on controlled foreign companies in Cyprus
On April 5, 2019, the Parliament of the Republic of Cyprus approved the law on the introduction of the provisions of EU Directive 2016/1164 (Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive) to the national tax legislation. The law will apply to tax periods starting from January 2019.
This Directive requires, inter alia, that countries with no provisions on controlled foreign companies in their national tax legislation shall adopt such provisions and bring them into effect by 01.01.2019.
It should be noted that regulations on controlled foreign companies apply only to Cyprus corporate taxpayers, i.e. only a Cyprus company, but not an individual, may be recognized as a controlling person.
In accordance with the law a foreign legal entity or a permanent establishment of a Cyprus company shall be recognized as controlled subject to the following conditions:
- The ownership share of a Cyprus company in a foreign legal entity directly or indirectly amounts to at least 50%;
- The effective income tax rate at which a foreign company or a permanent establishment pays taxes amounts to less than 50% of the amount of taxes that would be paid by a Cyprus company at its current income tax rate.
If a foreign legal entity or a permanent establishment of a Cyprus company is recognized as controlled, the tax base of the Cyprus company shall include retained earnings of the controlled foreign company.
Transfer pricing in Cyprus
On June 30, 2017, the Cyprus tax authorities issued the Circular that introduced new provisions for financial transactions between related parties (intra-group financial transactions) subject to transfer pricing standards (TP). New provisions became effective on July 1, 2017 and generally cover the arm’s length principle set in accordance with TP recommendations stipulated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Circular applies to both current and future intra-group financial transactions.
The arm’s length principle is not new for Cyprus. It has been since 2003, that in order to harmonize with the provisions of Article 9 of the OECD Model Convention, Cyprus has an active provision of Article 33 of the Income Tax Law, which stipulates that all transactions between interdependent persons shall follow the arm’s length principle.
The OECD has provided its definition for the arm’s length concept, and it means the following: all transactions between interdependent persons shall be carried out on market conditions, as if the parties were independent of each other and acted in accordance with their own interests only. It is important that this principle, as well as the provisions of Article 33 of the Income Tax Law, shall apply to any transactions between related parties. Therefore, according to the law, it has been since 2003 that related companies in Cyprus have been obliged to offer each other their goods and services, as well as to provide loans based on market conditions.
With the release of the Circular, companies shall not only comply with the arm’s length principle, but also prepare a background statement for the selected interest rate and margin of the transaction and submit it to the tax authorities. Such analysis prepared by independent experts shall be mandatory for all intra-group financial contracts, regardless of the name the parties give to such a contract, since the above-mentioned circular further emphasizes that the actual behavior of participants to the transaction and its economic substance prevail over formal agreements of the parties.
According to the new Circular, in order to accurately determine an intra-group financial transaction, it is necessary to determine its characteristics, such as terms and functions, assets used, and risks assumed by related parties.
Once an intra-group financial transaction is accurately determined, the price shall be analyzed for compliance with the arm’s length principle by comparing it to compatible transactions in the market at the time of the intra-group financial transaction, and taking into account the price that would be agreed by independent parties in a compatible transaction in the market under similar conditions (“compatibility” adjustments are possible, but they should meet internationally recognized standards).
At the same time, if a taxpayer carries out only intermediary activities for providing loans or cash advances to related parties, which in turn are financed by loans or cash advances from related parties, then simplified measures may be applied. When using “simplified measures”, intra-group financial transactions shall be recognized as compliant with the arm’s length principle if the return on assets net of tax amounts to at least 2%. This indicator shall be regularly reviewed by the Cyprus tax authorities. It is assumed that no TP analysis is required for the implementation of “simplified measures”. However, a deviation of the minimum return on assets net of tax of 2% is possible only in case of an appropriate TP analysis, which confirms the marketability of such a deviation. The use of “simplified measures” by taxpayers should be reflected in the taxpayer’s annual tax return.
2019 was full of events in the legislative and enforcement spheres. Novation has affected particularly the scope of international private law.
March 13, 2020
From January 01, 2020, tax authorities will maintain the State Information Resource of Accounting Statements (GIRBO). The Law No. 247-ФЗ dated 26.07.2019 establishes the procedure for submission of the accounting statements (including amended statements) to the GIRBO.
March 13, 2020
In the traditional annual review article devoted to innovations in the legislation of the Russian Federation, we have collected for you the most interesting short stories of the Russian legislator that will come out in 2020.
March 13, 2020
One of the innovations that completely changed the current practice was the introduction of liability for illegal currency transactions in the form of a fine amounting to 75 to 100 % of the amount of the currency transaction.
March 13, 2020
The past year of 2019 was quite rich in tax disputes concerning the issues of determining and qualifying a beneficial owner of income. In this article, we offer a review of key court decisions made in 2019. At the same time, in this article we will only pay attention to the arguments made by regulatory authorities and courts.
March 12, 2020
In 2019, major changes for the recent years — the so-called procedural revolution — took place. On October 1, three key laws that reform the system of general jurisdiction courts and change the rules of court procedure came into force.
March 12, 2020
Tax profit can be fundamentally different from accounting profit. In this article, we will consider situations that are not so obvious but occur quite often, like when a company incorporated in Cyprus has differences between accounting profit and tax profit.
March 12, 2020
Rumors regarding the introduction of an electronic register of beneficiaries in European jurisdictions have been around for a long time and finally, they have become real. On May 30, 2018, the European Union issued Directive 2018/843 amending EU Directive 2015/849 dated 20.05.2015.
March 12, 2020